Greenwashing: Why socially responsible investing is not always as it seems

When it comes to buying ‘green’ and ‘socially responsible’ products, never has the term “caveat emptor” (let the buyer beware) been more apt.

 

A few years ago, the term ‘greenwashing’ was coined thanks to the unscrupulous behaviour of companies that made their products appear to be more environmentally friendly than they were. Sadly, it remains a problem across all sectors today – the car emissions scandal being a great example of this – and can arguably be used to describe some so-called socially responsible funds being marketed to investors.

 

The rise of socially responsible investing

In 2008, the amount of global assets invested ‘ethically’ was around £4 billion. Ten years later, that figure has quadrupled to over £16 billion, and this trend is set to continue. As a result, many new investment products have come to market in order to meet this demand. Of course, this is an incredibly positive step for our industry. Not only does it mean that investors have more choice and can invest according to their own beliefs, it also means they can come together and positively influence business practices by choosing where they are prepared to invest their money – or not, as the case may be. At the same time, though, a rapidly growing sector can also have underlying issues. Until regulation catches up with best practice, investors must be extra vigilant.

 

Choosing wisely

At Sanlam, we invest in socially responsible funds on behalf of our clients and, over the last few years, it has been pleasing to see the opportunity pool grow. We are now able to build more diverse portfolios and find some exciting investments, while retaining our core tenet of providing a socially responsible solution that delivers on client goals over the long term.
 
However, with this growth, we have learned to tread very carefully. Several funds have reinvented themselves in the wake of this increased demand. But other than a name change, or a small process adjustment, they haven’t really changed much at all, and are far from being what we would deem a ‘socially responsible fund’. It seems there are organisations out there who understand the growing importance of ethical investing and want to capitalise on it without really adopting the core principles that this type of investing encompasses.
 
So-called ‘greenwashing’ makes our job even more important as we pull back the curtain and take a proper look at these investments. Here is what we look for when selecting a good socially responsible fund:
 

  1. This is not a box-ticking exercise

    Just because an investment claims to incorporate socially responsible values by undertaking a risk review against environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics, that doesn’t make it socially responsible. Unfortunately, we often find these metrics are overly simplistic or that the focus is on one area (usually governance) and disregards environmental and social factors. While ESG risk governance is hugely important, it must be done well. We look for funds that show commitment to all aspects of the environmental, social and governance mix – not just one or two of these things. They must have social responsibility at their heart and have highly detailed policies on sustainability, engagement, stewardship, governance and voting. 

  2. Performance

    Socially responsible investing doesn’t mean foregoing the best returns in favour of your beliefs. History has shown that ESG funds can perform as well, if not better, than their non-ESG counterparts. Take, for example, the Liontrust UK Sustainable Growth fund, which is one of the strongest performers in the IA UK All Companies sector, while retaining its socially responsible tilt. The reason for their outperformance is twofold. The fund invests in companies that, by their very nature, have longer-term and sustainable strategies – plus the companies themselves are well positioned to take advantage of increased awareness and changing consumer behaviours.  

  3. Negative and positive screening

    We don’t just look for funds that actively discount companies based on their practices, but also actively select companies based on their positive contribution to society. As capital allocators, we have the power to initiate change, and that is what we intend to do. We look for funds that can use their position as a shareholder to positively influence best practice.

  4. Demonstration of Socially Responsible Values

    While it is incredibly important that a fund follows a strict socially responsible process while performing well, we also select investments where the wider organisation demonstrates its commitment to ethical considerations. We look for fund houses that have a track record in striving for positive change, whether it be via commitments to UN Compacts, a key focus on improving their company diversity and Gender Pay Gap figures, or even contributions to community projects. Creating an environment where corporate responsibility is high on the agenda reinforces our conviction in their ethical funds, as we can see tangible evidence of alignment with client interests.

 

Tailor-made solutions

We have built portfolios that contain a mixture of socially responsible approaches – from engaging with companies to put pressure on them for positive change, to not deploying capital to organisations that we deem as harmful to social and environmental progress. As we stated earlier, we have the power to initiate change, and that is what we intend to do. We enjoy working with clients to incorporate their own values in their investments and can tailor our portfolios to suit your needs and beliefs.
 

Sources

https://www.ipe.com/news/esg/co-op-scheme-adopts-esg-fund-for-dc-default/www.ipe.com/news/esg/co-op-scheme-adopts-esg-fund-for-dc-default/10032257.fullarticle

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-07/australia-s-pension-funds-adopt-esg-mantle-as-politicians-balk

Friede, Funnar, Timo Busch and Alexander Bassen (2015), ‘ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies’, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. Roughly 90% of studies find a non-negative ESG-CFP relation. The positive ESG impact on CFP appears stable over time.

Financial Times, “UK ethical funds surge in popularity”. Data source: Investment Association in September 2018

https://www.liontrust.co.uk/sustainable
 

Please navigate to a service or product page and add the document to your brochure to continue.

Back
Name your brochure
Your details
Thank you!

Your brochure is on its way.

Brochure Confirmation - your brochure is on its way.

We hope you find this useful.

The value of investments and any income from them can fall and you may get back less than you invested.